Somehow, I inherently realized that not everything I wrote would be a success. I understood rejection was part of the process. I was also stubborn – I mean persistent. It’s still difficult to receive a standard, “This does not meet our editorial needs.” I’ve learned to celebrate my victories and make them shine brighter than multiple rejections. In this post I am referring to shorter pieces, but many of the thoughts may apply to books as well.
Here are some ABC’s (and DEF & G too) to remember when receiving rejection.
A. You’re not being rejected. Your arrangement of words is being rejected. It is difficult to separate your writing from who you are, but this is an important skill to master.
B. The words are not dead. There was no final cigarette, blindfold, or shots from a firing squad. An editor is simply saying no. The same piece could find life the next time you send it out.
C. Your talent isn’t on trial. Don’t assume your writing is only fit to wrap fish like last week’s news. Often a submission simply doesn’t meet the current need. It might mean, we purchased something like this already, we sold another ad on page 13, or we found what we need for the next couple months.
D. You did the work. If only for yourself, it proves you did the work and you sent your work out. That is so much more than many who say they will do something someday.
E. You have something to send out again. You can research another market and send the article or inquiry out again. You may have to rework your words for the new market, but you won’t need to start from scratch.
F. Your chances improve. With each effort you get better, and you learn more about marketing your work. Odds are in your favor that, with persistence, you’ll find yourself accepting a check instead of receiving a rejection.
G. You can submit to the same place again. Here’s a secret – unless your words were astonishingly bad, an editor who sees thousands of manuscripts a day is unlikely to recognize seeing the same one again. Wait six to eight months and send it again. A whole new line-up of ideas and needs will be on the table. What didn’t fit before might fit now. (There might even be a new editor at the desk).
A new scientific study even suggests rejection breeds creativity. Who knew? Rejection makes us get out of our comfort zone and try new things, making us stronger and more determined. Did you know Max Lucado’s first book, On the Anvil, was rejected fifteen times? Stephen King’s first novel, Carrie, was rejected 30 times. John Grisham’s first book, A Time to Kill, more than 20 times.
So, keep working. Keep studying your craft. And keep submitting!
Comments on: "Receiving and Rising Above Rejection" (20)
The most important part of your headline was the “rising above” part of rejection. It’s so easy to let rejection define us, but it doesn’t. Once we’ve regrouped, rejection can serve as the impetus to do better, to try again, and to learn. It’s important to take a day or so to lick our wounds, but it’s also critical to rise above it and move forward. We’ve all been knocked around and you’re right – we do become attached to those stories we created, and it’s hard sometimes not to take rejection personally.
I’m glad you found this post and it encouraged you to rise above. Remember the winds of aversity move the sails and the iritations make the pearls.
Definitely some good tips to keep in mind. And it’s always encouraging (to me, at least) to know that famous authors had to slog through the process too.
Yes, everyone has been rejected. I tried to focus on the possitives here. Glad to know it was helpful.
[...] Receiving and Rising Above Rejection (peterdmallett.wordpress.com) [...]
[...] Receiving and Rising Above Rejection (peterdmallett.wordpress.com) [...]
[...] Receiving and Rising Above Rejection (peterdmallett.wordpress.com) [...]
[...] Receiving and Rising Above Rejection (peterdmallett.wordpress.com) [...]
Rejection is always hard to deal with — especially when it concerns a creative endeavor. Thank you for the encouragement and the perspective.
Thank you. I am glad to know it was helpful. The article I linked too near the end of the post was interesting too, suggesting that in some ways we should be thankful for rejections. It depends though on how we handle it, which was the inspiration for the article.
Thanks. It helps to put those rejections in perspective.
These were very useful, especially G. I wondered whether submitting the same piece again to the same journal was possible, but never tried it as I was never sure. I’ll be following up on that advice.
Thank you, I needed to read this today. The difficult part of freelancing today is that many places do not even send a rejection, you just get silence. I would rather receive a clear cut rejection and cross it off the list.
I’m so glad to know you read it when you needed it. It is true, I always apreciate places that get back to you either way even if it is an autoresponse, or form letter.
Early in my writing life, C was always a killer for me. It took me a long time to grasp that being talented and meeting the needs of a publication were two different things. Thanks for the good advice. HF
Thanks for your response, It is interesting to hear what was a hurdle for different people.
As a career salesperson, your post resonates well with me! Thanks
I’m glad to know it has a wider application than what it was written about.
Love this post, especially B. Too often we think that a mere ‘no’ from another human being (whom we automatically think knows more than we do) is the death of what we’ve submitted.
Thanks for this reminder. And for pointing out that even the greats were told ‘no.’ A lot.
I’m glad you enjoyed it. Thank you for letting me know the specific things that stood out for you. It helps with future posts.